Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Welker vs Andjela Lazarevic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Welker vs Lazarevic analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Emily Welker vs Andjela Lazarevic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Welker 0 - 0 Lazarevic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Welker has won 39.62% of points on their second serve, while Lazarevic has won 40.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Welker, in recent form, has won 57.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lazarevic has won 52.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.98% and 34.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Welker has saved 45.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lazarevic has saved 49.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Welker has won 55% of matches played (W/L 22/ 18), with Lazarevic winning 31.58% (W/L 6/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 48/ 45). Lazarevic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 42/ 32), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Welker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 20/ 12), where as Lazarevic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 6/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Welker has played against opponents with an average rank of 153.35 while Lazarevic has played against players with an average rank of 87.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Welker has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lazarevic has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Welker has converted 50.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lazarevic has converted 47.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
770
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
Form
55% (121-100)
Career Total W/L
56% (43-34)
59% (10-7)
YTD W/L
22% (2-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Emily Welker vs Andjela Lazarevic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Welker VS Lazarevic
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Welker | Andjela Lazarevic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (10/7) | 22% (2/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (23/18) | 26% (5/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (197/188) | 44% (74/94) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 22% (2/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.44 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 131.47 | 185.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (878/1244) | 56% (303/540) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (475/878) | 58% (175/303) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (145/366) | 40% (95/237) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (103/204) | 48% (30/63) |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (649/1281) | 42% (221/521) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (10/7) | 22% (2/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 22% (2/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 44% (9/4) | 0% (6/0) |
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Emily Welker
Player
Alessia Popescu
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Valentina Ivanov
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tilwith Di Girolami
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Nikol Rivkin
82%
(
77 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
76 of
107)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emily Welker
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Maria Ionescu
Player
Emily Welker
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Evelyne Atticia Tiron
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
51%
(
48 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Maria Ionescu
Player
Emily Welker
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Andjela Lazarevic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sonia Cassani
Player
Andjela Lazarevic
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nevena Carton
Player
Andjela Lazarevic
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
47%
(
48 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Andjela Lazarevic
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ani Vangelova
Player
Andjela Lazarevic
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
1
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denise Valente
Player
Andjela Lazarevic
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Andjela Lazarevic
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andjela Lazarevic
Player
Samantha Imbo Nloga
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Andjela Lazarevic
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andjela Lazarevic
Player
Klio Maria Ioannou
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Doga Turkmen
Player
Andjela Lazarevic
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
41 of
98)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Welker Vs Lazarevic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Welker are available here and Lazarevic photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emily Welker
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
